|
Have you ever wondered what it might be like if our
founding fathers and mothers could step off the pages of history books,
come down from their monuments, and speak with us? My work can generally
be described as that of a Thomas Jefferson impersonator, motivational
speaker, or a Thomas Jefferson re-enactor. Some simply say
that I am a Thomas Jefferson look-alike. My favorite way to explain
what I do is to say that I am a 1st-Person Interpreter. First-person
interpretation is the dramatic portrayal of our nation's heroes as they
were before they were encased in statues and imprisoned in books. The
first-person interpreter gives a heartbeat to the priceless knowledge
we have gathered from artifacts and ink, breathes life into the
history we have learned from museums and memorials, and speaks the
thousand words a picture is worth.
Watch
a 5 minute video.
Read
a magazine article about what I do.
I shape my presentations according to the distinct
interests and schedules of specific audiences, as well as to the
nature of each event. Usually I begin my show with a
biographical monologue that focuses on subjects and stories requested.
Then I engage the audience in a Q&A session, which is
my favorite part.
I often root my presentation on a portrayal
of Jefferson as a man of 33 - his age when he wrote the Declaration
of Independence. However, each venue is unique, and I therefore
address themes and events from the entire span of Jefferson's
life according to the inclination of the most important people
in the room - the audience!
Read
a newspaper article about what I do.
Thomas Jefferson was uncomfortable with giving
speeches. In portraying Jefferson I must connect immediately
with varied audiences. As a result I am presented with a difficult
puzzle: how to portray, on stage in an interactive setting, the
character of a person who shunned crowds. It was my struggle
with this paradox that led me to my current method of Thomas Jefferson
interpretation, " The Performance Conversation." With this
approach I progress quickly to a modified question-and-answer
format. This allows the audience to choose the direction in which
the show moves, the subjects we cover together, and the intensity
of the interaction. This approach allows me to cultivate an atmosphere
more appropriate to Jefferson's disposition: a dialogue between
performer and audience.
|

Oil Portrait of
Steve Edenbo as Thomas Jefferson
Painting by the talented artist
Pamela Patrick White
|
Eight years ago, when I began this work, I relied primarily
on the traditional structure of a question-and-answer session. Such an approach
creates a strictly controlled interactive experience in which the performer
determines the length of time devoted to a subject, as well as the spin
given to each subject. An audience member asks a question, and the performer
addresses that question - often with an established performance piece, composed
earlier, to address a general subject into which a given set of questions
might fit. In this setting, once a particular subject has been covered,
it is generally not revisited.
When the situation allows I expand the standard
Q&A construct, tailoring my answers to invite audiences to delve
further. I challenge my audiences to challenge me, in the person of
Thomas Jefferson, to explain and defend Jefferson's views, actions, and
words. First, I strive to answer questions in the simplest form. Then, if
the questioner is in search of more specific information, I encourage them
to further define the subjects they wish to discuss or debate. Such an approach
draws the audience in, transforming them from spectators into participants.
Jefferson believed that the exchange of conflicting ideas in an informed,
civilized environment was the basis of a free society. Although Jefferson
despised argument, he loved the dialectic, the give-and-take, and believed
it essential to the strength of a mind and of a nation.
I have found that this philosophy also engenders a vibrant performance environment.
On the other hand I do not require the audience to do
the work to ensure a lively performance. The audience is there
to have a good time with their education. When I say that I allow
the audience to control the amount of interaction in a performance, I also
mean that, if they wish, they can simply sit-back, watch, and listen.
When I first began to learn the art of historical interpretation from
William Sommerfield of The
American Historical Theatre , he taught me that the core of first-person
interpretation is theater. The bottom line is that if the audience
members are engaged and enjoy themselves while they learn, then I have
done my job. Many people have the best time when they can jump in
and join the fray. Others prefer a little more distance.
In the end the direction my show takes is up to the
audience. The majority rules.
I think Mr. Jefferson would appreciate that.
|